Site logo

FIA determined to ensure 2026 rules don't create an F1 'chess game'

NEWS STORY
27/08/2025

Amidst fears that rules overhaul will lead to drivers facing a higher workload instead of simply racing, the FIA insists this is not the case.

Following simulator tests a number of drivers, including Max Verstappen, Charles Leclerc and Alex Albon, have spoken out, warning that the new generation of cars are "too complex", while Williams boss James Vowles has said that drivers face a tougher workload.

Thankfully, DRS is out, only to be replaced by the equally gimmicky Manual Override Mode, while other innovations include energy management systems and (legal) active aero.

As opposed to elbows out racing it is feared that drivers will spend Sunday afternoons managing their cars and dealing with the numerous newly introduced innovations.

Not so, insists the FIA's Single-Seater Director, Nikolas Tombazis.

"Albon and other drivers haven't driven the final rules yet," he tells Motorsport.com, "because they're not done yet. Secondly, for sure if you don't automate certain parts, there will be an increased burden on the drivers. That is true.

"Part of the work that still needs to be done between now and the start of next season is to determine how much of that stuff will be in the background," he continues, "let's say more automatic, versus how much the driver will have to control.

"We don't want to overburden the driver with something. But at the same time there has to be a degree of freedom, to make sure that he can attack, defend and have some of that stuff under his control.

"But there will, for sure, be some part of it which will be managed transparently to him, so he doesn't have to think about it when cornering or something like that.

"I think there's a balance to strike between driving like a chess game of energy management, which we don't want as one extreme, and then the other extreme where driving is just a steering wheel, a throttle pedal and a brake pedal. We need to find a good way in the middle.

"I think smart drivers already prevail," he says. "The difference in performance that we see nowadays in F1 includes a percentage of that. And that's not only now, the mental bandwidth of drivers has been a factor for the last 20 years already, also in the younger days of my career, when I was working with Schumacher for example.

"Obviously he was phenomenally talented, but a big part of what set him apart was that he could also think of all these other things during a race.

"Amongst the current drivers there are some who seem to have a bit extra to think about other things as well, while some others have to use all their CPU to drive the car.

"These drivers are the best drivers in the world, and they have quite a high bandwidth of intellect. They can deal with certain problems," he insists.

"There's a level of understanding they need to have of these parameters," he admits. "We think that's part of what a top driver has to do. It's not, however, and we will make sure it isn't, the main skill. The main skill is still to be able to brake at the right point, to go fast around the corner, to find the limit, select the right lines, etc. That will still be the main parameter that controls who's good and who's bad. I wouldn't be able to drive the car!"

Whether the cars are indeed "too complex" and the drivers do indeed face a tougher workload aside, the most worrying aspect about all this - other than the fact that it would appear that the drivers have had little or no input - is that with just five months to go before the first test in Barcelona, the regulations appear to be a work in progress with certain aspects being 'made up' along the way.

LATEST NEWS

more news >

RELATED ARTICLES

LATEST IMAGES

galleries >

  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images

POST A COMMENT

or Register for a Pitpass ID to have your say

Please note that all posts are reactively moderated and must adhere to the site's posting rules and etiquette.

Post your comment

READERS COMMENTS

 

1. Posted by Spindoctor, 28/08/2025 13:56

"Like everyone else has said in this thread (let's face it we *are* hardcore F1 Racing fans) Tombazis is talking rubbish, at least from our point of view. We may bicker about details, but we're pretty much united in a desire to see brilliant drivers driving the most sophisticated *racing* machines as fast as possible & engaging in both tactical (overtakes) & strategic manoeuvring to that end.

I initially supported the move towards hybrid PUs, precisely because of their technical sophistication (I'm a gadget freak, OK?). As things have developed, with the current Ground Effect behemoths, and the silly deliberately crappy tyres I've lost all enthusiasm or interest in the cars.
I know the drivers are (mostly) near superhuman in their mental & physical abilities in the cars, but the balance has already switched too far away from balls-out driving heroism & brilliance to a form of mobile resource management. Adding additional management tasks doesn't add anything to the excitement of F1.

Despite the reality of tedious weekends of tyre management etc. the paid commentators continue to extoll how wonderful it is. I can't see even the most boring of them wetting their pants over Max's brilliant use of energy management, or berating Lewis because he drove 'too fast'. Come to think of it, maybe I can....

So Let's just have some very fast, light (but safe) smaller cars running on sensible tyres which wear predictably as is the case in MotoGP. I appreciate it's too late for any of this to happen but..."

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

2. Posted by Celtic Tiger, 27/08/2025 0:08

"So DRS will be replaced with Manual Override Mode? If they rename the DRS zones "MOM zones" I'm afraid that my teenage kids will have an absolute field day with that.

I like how he contradicts himself straight out of the gate with motorsport.com. Max and the gang is not correct because the rules aren't done yet, however, they are correct about what they've said too. BS tap-dancing at its finest from Tombazis.
With DRS, brake balance, drinks, radio, engine modes and most likely a handful of other things apart from clutch and shifting gears, myself, like many other commenting would love a return to basic Steering wheel, shifter and pedals. When the cars computer is doing more to drive the car than the pilot then we've lost the plot on pure motor racing.
At the very least, chucking 85% of the computer sh*te would go a long way in instilling a sense of heroism back in the eyes of fans for their drivers. There's a reason people talk about Fangio, Clark, Stewart, Senna, Schumi etc. decades beyond their careers because it was 100%-90% them making those cars dance. The only real thing that today's drivers have is race craft to inspire that awe in the fan base and even then the FIA stewards stick their oars in and over regulate that.
So, yeah, when every relevant person is telling you your regulations don't work then, surely, at some point Tombazis & co. need to just admit they f@#ked up."

Rating: Positive (4)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

3. Posted by BigJack, 26/08/2025 22:36

"Be afraid, be very afraid.... This load of BS is the reason I am losing interest in F1. It's no longer pure motorsport. It's too weighted towards clever technology and entertainment!"

Rating: Positive (2)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

4. Posted by Team Hack, 26/08/2025 18:05

""and then the other extreme where driving is just a steering wheel, a throttle pedal and a brake pedal".

How can the above now be 'extreme' as it is at the very core of motor racing and has been since the sport began.

Modern racing is saturated with 'Tech', battalions of engineers and 'Command' centres back at base and with AI around the corner who knows what to expect next?

Just a steering wheel, a throttle pedal and a brake pedal?

Sounds exactly like what we need!"

Rating: Positive (5)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

5. Posted by Burton, 26/08/2025 17:51

""I think there's a balance to strike between driving like a chess game of energy management, which we don't want as one extreme, and then the other extreme where driving is just a steering wheel, a throttle pedal and a brake pedal. We need to find a good way in the middle."

lolno"

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

6. Posted by Superbird70, 26/08/2025 16:19

"I think all telemetry between car and pit should be banned to make this even more interesting. The diagnostic aids allowed should be the road relevant, check engine light, fuel level, temperature and oil gauges, and parking brake indicator."

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

7. Posted by Anthony, 26/08/2025 14:15

"F1 is now a multi billion dollar business and it is utterly ridiculous that, as noted by the editor, with 5 months to go to the first test the rules are still work in progress. "

Rating: Positive (4)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

8. Posted by TonyMan, 26/08/2025 13:14

"Most other forms of racing are about "the throttle, brakes & steering". That's how the drivers learnt their skills."

Rating: Positive (6)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

9. Posted by Max Noble, 26/08/2025 10:50

"You cannot complain because I’ve not written them yet! Good grief. So what have they been designing to? Which bits will we automate? I bet the software and mechanical engineers working on those bits are delighted to know that Uncle Tom could make his mind up by 1st March 2026…!"

Rating: Positive (6)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

Share this page

X

Copyright © Pitpass 2002 - 2025. All rights reserved.

about us  |  advertise  |  contact  |  privacy & security  |  rss  |  terms